Procedural performance between two cryoballoon systems for ablation of atrial fibrillation depends on pulmonary vein anatomy

9Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Cryoballoon ablation is a first-line therapy for atrial fibrillation. We compared the efficacy and safety of two ablation systems and addressed the influence of pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy on performance and outcome. Methods: We consecutively enrolled 122 patients who were planned for first-time cryoballoon ablation. Patients were assigned 1:1 for ablation with the POLARx or the Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFAP) system and followed-up for 12 months. Procedural parameters were recorded during the ablation. Before the procedure, a magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the PVs was generated and diameter, area, and shape of each PV ostium were assessed. We applied an evaluated PV anatomical scoring system on our MRA measurement data ranging from 0 (best anatomical combination) to 5. Results: Procedures performed with POLARx were associated with shorter time to balloon temperature −30°C (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Menger, V., Frick, M., Sharif-Yakan, A., Emrani, M., Zink, M. D., Napp, A., … Gramlich, M. (2023). Procedural performance between two cryoballoon systems for ablation of atrial fibrillation depends on pulmonary vein anatomy. Journal of Arrhythmia, 39(3), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12842

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free