Decreased complications after total laryngectomy using a clinical care pathway

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Complications following total laryngectomy can lead to increased hospital length of stay (LOS) and increased health care costs. Our objective was to determine the efficacy of a clinical care pathway for improving outcomes for patients following total laryngectomy. Methods: This quality improvement study included all adult patients undergoing total laryngectomy—either primary or salvage— at a tertiary referral center between January 2013 and December 2018. The primary outcome was hospital LOS measured in postoperative days. The total and specific postoperative complication frequencies were evaluated, as well as 30-day readmission rates and intensive care unit (ICU) LOS. Results: Sixty-three patients were included in the study: 29 (46.0%) patients before the pathway implementation and 34 (54.0%) patients after pathway implementation. Demographic characteristics between the groups were similar. The prepathway cohort had a higher rate of total complications compared to the postpathway group (relative risk=0.5; 95% CI 0.3-1.0), although the differences in individual complications were similar. The median LOS of 10 days was the same for the 2 cohorts. The median ICU LOS was 1 day greater in the postpathway cohort, but no difference was seen in rates of ICU readmission in the 2 groups. The 30-day readmission rate also was not significant between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Implementation of a postoperative order set pathway for patients undergoing laryngectomy is associated with decreased overall complication rates. Use of a clinical care pathway may improve outcomes in patients undergoing total laryngectomy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brody-Camp, S. A., Parsel, S. M., Freeman, Z. A., McCoul, E. D., Hasney, C., & Moore, B. A. (2021). Decreased complications after total laryngectomy using a clinical care pathway. Ochsner Journal, 21(3), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.20.0070

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free