The sudden spin-down in the rotation of magnetar 1E 2259+586 observed by Archibald et al. was a rare event. However, that particular event, referred to as an anti-glitch, was followed by another event, which Archibald et al. suggested could either be a conventional glitch or another anti-glitch. Although there is no accompanying radiation activity or pulse profile change, there is decisive evidence of the existence of a second timing event, judging from the timing data. We apply a Bayesian Model Selection to quantitatively determine which of these possibilities better explains the observed data. We show that the observed data strongly support the presence of two successive anti-glitches with a Bayes factor, often called the odds ratio, greater than 40. Furthermore, we show that the second anti-glitch has an associated frequency change Δν of -8.2 × 10-8 Hz. We discuss the implications of these results for possible physical mechanisms behind this anti-glitch. © 2014. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
CITATION STYLE
Hu, Y. M., Pitkin, M., Heng, I. S., & Hendry, M. A. (2014). Glitch or anti-glitch: A bayesian view. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 784(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/784/2/L41
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.