Relation between financial advisory designations and FINRA misconduct FSR201714

9Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Registered representatives have no general fiduciary duty. CFP, ChFC, and CFA designees have higher ethical duties and education requirements. Registrants’ criminal, regulatory, complaint, and other misconduct history is public. This study examines misconduct disclosures of undesignated versus designated Florida securities salespeople, and finds adverse disclosure materially decreases for designees; it incidentally finds misconduct increases with maleness, dual investment advisor/regis-tered representative status, and life insurance sales licensure. This appears to be the first such study of adverse disclosure association with financial designations, adding to the emerging misconduct and advisors’ ethics literature. These findings offer important policy and consumer choice insight. © 2017 Academy of Financial Services. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Camarda, J. M. (2017). Relation between financial advisory designations and FINRA misconduct FSR201714. Financial Services Review, 26(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v26i3.3323

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free