Big Data, Biomedical Research, and Ethics Review: New Challenges for IRBs

40Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The increased use of big data in the medical field has shifted the way in which biomedical research is designed and carried out. The novelty of techniques and methods brought by big data research brings new challenges to institutional review boards (IRBs). Yet it is unclear if IRBs should be the responsible oversight bodies for big data research and, if so, which criteria they should use. A large but heterogenous set of ethics guidelines and normative responses have emerged to address these issues. In this study, we conducted a scoping review of soft-law documents and guidelines with the aim of assessing ongoing normative efforts that are proliferating in this domain. We also synthesize a set of recurrent guidelines that could work as a baseline to create a harmonized process for big data research ethics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferretti, A., Ienca, M., Hurst, S., & Vayena, E. (2020). Big Data, Biomedical Research, and Ethics Review: New Challenges for IRBs. Ethics and Human Research, 42(5), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500065

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free