Use of multi-objective optimization for digital human posture prediction

55Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

With sufficient fidelity, the use of virtual humans can save time, money, and lives through improved product design, process design, and understanding of behaviour. Optimization-based posture prediction is a unique tool, and this article presents a study that advances posture prediction with a multi-objective optimization (MOO) approach. MOO is used to both develop and combine the following human performance measures: joint displacement; musculoskeletal discomfort; and a variation on potential energy. The following MOO methods are studied in the context of human modelling: objective sum; min-max; and global criterion. Using MOO yields realistic results. Of the independent performance measures, discomfort generally provides the most accurate postures. Potential energy, however, is not a significant factor in governing human posture and should be combined with other performance measures. The three MOO methods for combining performance measures yield similar results, but the objective sum provides slightly more realistic postures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marler, R. T., Arora, J. S., Yang, J., Kim, H. J., & Abdel-Malek, K. (2009). Use of multi-objective optimization for digital human posture prediction. Engineering Optimization, 41(10), 925–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/03052150902853013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free