Quality of life assessment in patients with implant-supported and resin-bonded fixed prosthesis for bounded edentulous spaces

44Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: Dental implants have become increasingly popular in the prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with bounded edentulous spaces. Oral condition-related quality of life (QOL) levels have rarely been assessed in these patients. Material and methods: Two groups of subjects with bounded edentulous spaces were studied: an implant-supported fixed prosthesis group (11 patients) and a resin-bonded fixed prosthesis group (33 patients). The two groups were well matched in terms of sex, age, missing units and location of missing units. The patients were requested to answer a self-administered QOL questionnaire with two major subscales - oral condition- and general condition-related QOL scores. The test-retest reliability of each question was pre-examined and found acceptable (mean Spearman rank correlation coefficient was 0.55 ± 0.16). Mean QOL score differences between the two groups were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U-test. Results: Mean oral condition-related QOL scores of the implant-supported and resin-bonded fixed prosthesis groups were 87.8 ± 9.5 and 87.1 ± 12.3% (P = 0.85), and mean general condition-related QOL scores were 73.8 ± 14.8 and 71.6 ± 15.2% (P = 0.95), respectively. No significant QOL differences between the two groups were observed in the two subscales. Conclusion: In patients with bounded edentulous spaces, multidimensional QOL levels of patients with an implant-supported fixed prosthesis do not exceed those of patients with a resin-bonded fixed prosthesis in a short follow-up period. Copyright © Blackwell Munksgaard 2002.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sonoyama, W., Kuboki, T., Okamoto, S., Suzuki, H., Arakawa, H., Kanyama, M., … Yamashita, A. (2002). Quality of life assessment in patients with implant-supported and resin-bonded fixed prosthesis for bounded edentulous spaces. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 13(4), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130403.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free