HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests

10Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Point of care rapid diagnostic tests (POC-RDT) for Hepatitis C virus (HCV), Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Hepatitis B virus (HBV), are ideal for screening in non-clinical outreach settings as they can provide immediate results and facilitate diagnosis, allowing high risk population screening. The aim of this study was to compare POC-RDT with laboratory conventional tests. A total of 301 vulnerable evaluable subjects (drug users, migrants and homeless population) were recruited at a mobile screening unit in outreach settings in Madrid. Fingerprick whole blood capillary samples were tested using the SD BIOLINE HCV POC-RDT, Determine HIV Early Detect and Determine HBsAg 2, and the results were assessed against the LIAISON XL HCV, HIV and Murex-HBsAg-Quant, reference assays, respectively. The feasibility and user satisfaction of the POC-RDT were evaluated through a questionnaire. The resolved sensitivity and resolved specificity and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were as follows, respectively: SD-BIOLINE-HCV: 98.8% (95% CI 93.4, 100.0) and 100.0% (95% CI 98.3, 100.0); Determine HIV Early Detect: 100% (95% CI 85.2, 100.0) and 100% (95% CI 98.7, 100); and Determine HBsAg 2: 66.7% (95% CI 9.4, 99.2) and 100.0% (95% CI 98.7, 100.0). As expected, the number of subjects with a confirmed positive result for HBsAg was very low (n = 4). Therefore, the analytical sensitivity has been evaluated in addition: The Determine HBsAg 2 test demonstrated 100% sensitivity for standard concentrations ≥ 0.125 IU/mL. The subject questionnaire yielded positive feedback for most subjects. The POC-RDT fingerprick blood collection method was well received, and the tests demonstrated a comparable clinical performance with conventional tests in outreach settings and vulnerable high-risk populations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muñoz-Chimeno, M., Valencia, J., Rodriguez-Recio, A., Cuevas, G., Garcia-Lugo, A., Manzano, S., … Ryan, P. (2023). HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33925-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free