Abstract
Purpose: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), an evaluation instrument, requires a validation process to guarantee the measurement of skills related to clinical reasoning. The OSCE is relevant for decision-making during the formation process for professional practice, so the purpose of this study is to determine the content validity and inter-rater reliability of an OSCE, during a physiotherapy undergraduate program for clinical reasoning. Methods: Instrumental design, which identified content validity through internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), added to recognition of the inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient). Results: The instrument demonstrated good internal consistency (0.98) and its concordance is from a substantial to an almost perfect degree of agreement. Conclusion: The OSCE proved to be a suitable instrument to assess the clinical reasoning skill of physiotherapy students; nevertheless, this validation process has limitations in the number of stations and the little application in physiotherapy.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Cobo-Mejía, E. A., Sandoval-Cuellar, C., Vi̇Llarraga-Nieto, A. D. P., Alfonso-Mora, M. L., Castellanos-Garrido, A. L., Acosta-Otálora, M. L., … Castellanos-Vega, R. del P. (2022). VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF AN “OSCE” FOR CLINICAL REASONING IN PHYSIOTHERAPY. Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, 33(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.839006
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.