VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF AN “OSCE” FOR CLINICAL REASONING IN PHYSIOTHERAPY

1Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), an evaluation instrument, requires a validation process to guarantee the measurement of skills related to clinical reasoning. The OSCE is relevant for decision-making during the formation process for professional practice, so the purpose of this study is to determine the content validity and inter-rater reliability of an OSCE, during a physiotherapy undergraduate program for clinical reasoning. Methods: Instrumental design, which identified content validity through internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), added to recognition of the inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient). Results: The instrument demonstrated good internal consistency (0.98) and its concordance is from a substantial to an almost perfect degree of agreement. Conclusion: The OSCE proved to be a suitable instrument to assess the clinical reasoning skill of physiotherapy students; nevertheless, this validation process has limitations in the number of stations and the little application in physiotherapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cobo-Mejía, E. A., Sandoval-Cuellar, C., Vi̇Llarraga-Nieto, A. D. P., Alfonso-Mora, M. L., Castellanos-Garrido, A. L., Acosta-Otálora, M. L., … Castellanos-Vega, R. del P. (2022). VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF AN “OSCE” FOR CLINICAL REASONING IN PHYSIOTHERAPY. Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, 33(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.839006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free