Evidence against the involvement of chemotaxis in swarming of Proteus mirabilis

24Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Nonswarming and nonchemotactic mutants of Proteus mirabilis were isolated after mutagenesis with N methyl N' nitro N nitrosoguanidine or ultraviolet light. These mutants were used in experiments to determine if chemotaxis is involved in the swarming of P. mirabilis. Nonchemotactic mutants failed to form chemotactic bands in a semisolid casein hydrolysate medium, yet they swarmed on the same medium containing 1.5% agar. Nonswarming mutants were attracted towards individual amino acids and components of tryptose. In cross feeding experiments, no evidence was obtained to indicate the production of a diffusable chemical repellent. In studies with the wild type P. mirabilis, no clear cut negative chemotaxis was seen even though three different assays were used and numerous chemicals were tested. Additional evidence against the involvement of chemotaxis in swarming comes from finding that dialysis does not interfere with swarming; swarm cells will swarm immediately when transferred to fresh media, and swarm cells will swarm on an agar water medium supplemented with a surfactant. These data indicate that chemotaxis is not involved in the swarming of P. mirabilis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, F. D., Anderson, D. M., Hoffman, P. S., Schwarzhoff, R. H., & Leonard, S. (1976). Evidence against the involvement of chemotaxis in swarming of Proteus mirabilis. Journal of Bacteriology, 127(1), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.127.1.237-248.1976

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free