Co-opted boards and earnings management: Evidence of reduced short-termist behavior

17Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study contributes to the emerging literature on board co-option by examining how and to what extent co-opted directors influence managers’ attitudes about earnings management. We find robust evidence that co-option mitigates both real activities and accrual-based earnings management. Our findings support the view that higher co-option reduces managerial short-termism because it enhances managers’ job security as co-opted directors are known to be less likely to remove managers from office. Our results are robust to different measures of both co-option and earnings management, and they continue to hold after accounting for endogeneity and selection concerns. Finally, we provide additional evidence showing that a higher degree of co-option lowers the likelihood of the chief executive officer (CEO) being forcefully removed from the office for managing earnings in the previous year. JEL CLASSIFICATION G30; G34; G39

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harris, O., & Erkan, A. (2023). Co-opted boards and earnings management: Evidence of reduced short-termist behavior. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 26(3), 256–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420987572

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free