Hasty Generalizations Are Pervasive in Experimental Philosophy: A Systematic Analysis

4Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Scientists may sometimes generalize from their samples to broader populations when they have not yet sufficiently supported this generalization. Do such hasty generalizations also occur in experimental philosophy? To check, we analyzed 171 experimental philosophy studies published between 2017 and 2023. We found that most studies tested only Western populations but generalized beyond them without justification. There was also no evidence that studies with broader conclusions had larger, more diverse samples, but they nonetheless had higher citation impact. Our analyses reveal important methodological limitations of many experimental philosophy studies and suggest that philosophical training may not protect against hasty generalizations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peters, U., & Lemeire, O. (2024). Hasty Generalizations Are Pervasive in Experimental Philosophy: A Systematic Analysis. Philosophy of Science, 91(3), 661–681. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.109

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free