Ownership matters: Private equity and the political division of ownership

23Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article returns to the issue of how ownership matters. It does so by developing a critique of the 'advantage-value-return' framework of assumptions about value creation from the product market, which are recurrent in resource based strategy and many other discourses that highlight what managers can do and the variable governance of management by owners. It then uses a case analysis of private equity and presents empirics which show how the financier general partners capture value so that general partners are enriched regardless of the performance of their investment funds. While private equity publicly claims to represent ownership with control for strategic decision making and operating efficiency, the undisclosed generic business model is the control of ownership through constructing a hierarchy of ownership claims for debt and equity suppliers in the capital market. Before or after the financial crisis that began in 2007, what matters is the position of the general partner as first among owners, not the motives, identity and actions of managers or the different suppliers of debt and equity. © The Author(s) 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Erturk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A., & Williams, K. (2010). Ownership matters: Private equity and the political division of ownership. Organization, 17(5), 543–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410372929

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free