"The State" of International Studies: Curriculum Design

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In recent decades, institutions across the United States have increasingly emphasized global education as a prerequisite to successful existence in a diverse yet interconnected world. At the same time, there is increasing awareness that the decline in international studies (IS) has resulted in the United States being ill prepared to address complex global challenges. King (2015) lamented that the United States now increasingly lacks regional experts who understand the country-specific challenges and can place them in a larger global strategic context. How the discipline engages students in a global environment matters; however, the field provides little guidance on how to design global studies majors. IS and global studies are apparently both important and neglected. This study examines the curricula for IS, international relations, international affairs, and global studies programs housed in political science. By reviewing more than 100 programs that offer bachelor's degrees, the authors identify similarities and differences in curricula and present a summative model of a typical IS program housed in political science departments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gentry, B., & Stojek, S. (2020). “The State” of International Studies: Curriculum Design. PS - Political Science and Politics, 53(2), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519002191

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free