CT artifacts after contrast media injection in chest imaging: Evaluation of post-processing algorithms, virtual monoenergetic images and their combination for artifact reduction

Abstract

Background: After injection into a brachial vein, high contrast media concentration in axillary and subclavian veins can cause artifacts that impair diagnostic utility. This study assessed artifact reduction by artifact-reduction-algorithms (ARA) and virtual-monoenergetic-images (VMI), as well as their combination (VMIARA) compared to conventional CT-images (CI). Methods: Forty-six spectral-detector-CT (SDCT) examinations of patients that received ARA-reconstructions due to perivenous-artifacts were included in this retrospective study. CI, ARA, VMI, and VMIARA (range: 70-200 keV) were reconstructed. Objective analysis was performed with ROI-based assessment of mean and standard deviation of attenuation (HU) in hypo- and hyperdense artifacts and impaired muscle and arteries as well as artifact-free reference-tissue. Extent of artifact reduction, assessment of surrounding soft tissue and vessels, and appearance of new artifacts were rated visually by two radiologists. Results: Hypo- and hyperdense artifacts showed significant improvement as evidenced by decreasing attenuation differences between artifact impaired and artifact-free reference tissue in ARA, VMI ≥80 keV, and VMIARA between 70-200 keV (e.g., CI/ARA/VMI100keV/VMIARA100keV: hypodense artifacts, (−)264.8±150.9/ (−)87.1±78.9/(−)48.6±64.6/9.9±63.9 HU; P<0.001); hyperdense artifacts, 164.2±51.1/82.1±73.2/7.9±34.7/ (−)17.3±50.7 HU; P<0.001). Artifacts impairing surrounding muscle and arteries were also reduced by all three approaches. In visual assessment, ARA, VMI ≥100 keV, and VMIARA between 70-200 keV also showed significant artifact reduction and improved assessment; however, for assessment of arteries improvement was not significant using ARA alone. New artifacts were reported, particularly at higher keV-values. Conclusions: In presence of perivenous-artifacts, ARA, VMI and their combination allow for significant artifact reduction; however, their combination and VMI as a standalone approach yielded best results and should therefore be used, if available.