De Facto Versus de Jure Political Institutions in the Long-Run: A Multivariate Analysis, 1820–2000

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper we use the components of the PolityIV project’s polity2 and Vanhanen’s Index of Democracy indicators to analyse the relationship between de jure and de facto political institutions from 1820 until 2000 with a canonical correlation method corrected for the sample selection bias. We find considerable fluctuation in the relationship between the two measures. After a moderate positive correlation found during the first half of the nineteenth century, the two measures become statistically unrelated until the 1940s. The relationship becomes strong and positive only in the second half of the twentieth century. The relationship between de jure and de facto political institutions hence can be described as a U-curve, reminiscent to an inverse Kuznets-curve.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Foldvari, P. (2017). De Facto Versus de Jure Political Institutions in the Long-Run: A Multivariate Analysis, 1820–2000. Social Indicators Research, 130(2), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1204-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free