Does the Surgical Reduction of High Grade Spondylolisthesis Restore Spino-Pelvic Alignment? An Analysis of 35 Patients

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective case series.Purpose: This study aimed to analyze how the sagittal spinopelvic alignment is influenced by an attempted surgical reduction of theL5–S1 segment in patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS).Overview of Literature: Conventional treatment strategies stress the importance of achieving fusion across the lumbosacral junctionin patients with HGS. The role of reduction in this subset of patients is controversial.Methods: This is a retrospective case series of 35 patients with Meyerding grades III, IV, or V spondylolisthesis who underwent surgicaltreatment in our institution. Before and after surgery, we took standing lateral radiographs from L1 vertebra to pelvis, includingthe femoral heads, and measured the slip grade, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, lumbosacral angle, and lumbar lordosis.Patients were subdivided into “balanced” and “unbalanced” pelvis groups. To determine the effect and correlation of reduction onthese spinopelvic parameters, we statistically compared the pre and postoperative measurements.Results: The average follow-up was 9 months (range, 3–169 months). Slip grade improved from an average 74.0%±13.2% to30.0%±14.0% (p <0.001), and lumbosacral angle reduced from an average 32.0°±11.6° to 6.0°±0.6° (p <0.001). Although the pelvic tiltwas reduced, this was not significant. There was a modest negative correlation between the reduction in slip grade and the increasein sacral slope (r =−0.3, p =0.06). At follow-up, five patients improved, from an unbalanced pelvis to a balanced pelvis. Fusion occurredin 33 patients (95%).Conclusions: Surgical reduction of HGS restores the lumbosacral alignment. However, a similar trend is not noted with the pelvicparameters