A prospective randomized experimental study to investigate the eradication rate of endometriosis after surgical resection versus aerosol plasma coagulation in a rat model

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the eradication rate of endometriosis after surgical resection (SR) vs. thermal ablation with aerosol plasma coagulation (AePC) in a rat model. Methods In this prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded animal study endometriosis was induced on the abdominal wall of 34 female Wistar rats. After 14 days endometriosis was either removed by SR or ablated by AePC. 14 days later the rats were euthanized to evaluate the eradication rate histopathologically. Intervention times were recorded. Results Eradication rate of endometriosis after 14 days did not significantly differ between AePC and SR (p=0.22). Intervention time per endometrial lesion was 22.1 s for AePC and 51.8 s for SR (p<0.0001). Conclusions This study compares the eradication rate of the new aerosol plasma coagulation device versus standard surgical resection of endometriosis in a rat model. Despite being a thermal method, AePC showed equality towards SR regarding eradication rate but with significantly shorter intervention time.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rothmund, R., Scharpf, M., Tsaousidis, C., Planck, C., Enderle, M. D., Neugebauer, A., … Kraemer, B. (2016). A prospective randomized experimental study to investigate the eradication rate of endometriosis after surgical resection versus aerosol plasma coagulation in a rat model. International Journal of Medical Sciences, 13(3), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.14246

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free