Abstract
In this article we study the amortized efficiency of the “move-to-front” and similar rules for dynamically maintaining a linear list. Under the assumption that accessing the ith element from the front of the list takes θ(i) time, we show that move-to-front is within a constant factor of optimum among a wide class of list maintenance rules. Other natural heuristics, such as the transpose and frequency count rules, do not share this property. We generalize our results to show that move-to-front is within a constant factor of optimum as long as the access cost is a convex function. We also study paging, a setting in which the access cost is not convex. The paging rule corresponding to move-to-front is the “least recently used” (LRU) replacement rule. We analyze the amortized complexity of LRU, showing that its efficiency differs from that of the off-line paging rule (Belady's MIN algorithm) by a factor that depends on the size of fast memory. No on-line paging algorithm has better amortized performance. © 1985, ACM. All rights reserved.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Sleator, D. D., & Tarjan, R. E. (1985). Amortized efficiency of list update and paging rules. Communications of the ACM, 28(2), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1145/2786.2793
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.