Policy forum: Peer-reviewed article: Revisiting the who analgesic ladder for surgical management of pain

8Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The opioid epidemic challenges current attitudes toward pain management and necessitates the reexamination of the World Health Organization (WHO) 3-step analgesic ladder, introduced in 1986 for cancer pain management. Surgical treatment of pain is a logical extension of the original guideline, which is often absent in conversations with patients about treatment options for their pain and consequentially underutilized. However, with concerns growing regarding opioid use, a shift in the stepwise approach of the WHO analgesic ladder in an age of developing technology and surgical offerings could have profound implications for patients and public health. Surgical interventions potentially provide a long-term, cost-effective management strategy to reduce opioid use. This review canvasses surgical options, highlights literature on failed back surgery syndrome and spinal cord stimulation and reconsiders the current ladder approach to pain management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McGuire, L. S., & Slavin, K. (2020, August 1). Policy forum: Peer-reviewed article: Revisiting the who analgesic ladder for surgical management of pain. AMA Journal of Ethics. American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2020.695

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free