Generation of Whole-Body FDG Parametric KiImages From Static PET Images Using Deep Learning

8Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

F-fluorodeoxyglucose parametric Ki images show a great advantage over static standard uptake value (SUV) images, due to the higher contrast and better accuracy in tracer uptake rate estimation. In this study, we explored the feasibility of generating synthetic Ki images from static SUV ratio (SUVR) images using three configurations of U-Nets with different sets of input and output image patches, which were the U-Nets with single input and single output (SISO), multiple inputs and single output (MISO), and single input and multiple outputs (SIMO). SUVR images were generated by averaging three 5-min dynamic SUV frames starting at 60-min post-injection, and then normalized by the mean SUV values in the blood pool. The corresponding ground-truth Ki images were derived using Patlak graphical analysis with input functions from the measurement of arterial blood samples. Even though the synthetic Ki values were not quantitatively accurate compared with ground truth, the linear regression analysis of joint histograms in the voxels of body regions showed that the mean R2 values were higher between U-Net prediction and ground truth (0.596, 0.580, and 0.576 in SISO, MISO, and SIMO), than that between SUVR and ground truth Ki (0.571). In terms of similarity metrics, the synthetic Ki images were closer to the ground-truth Ki images (mean SSIM = 0.729, 0.704, and 0.704 in SISO, MISO, and MISO) than the input SUVR images (mean SSIM = 0.691). Therefore, it is feasible to use deep learning networks to estimate the surrogate map of parametric Ki images from static SUVR images.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miao, T., Zhou, B., Liu, J., Guo, X., Liu, Q., Xie, H., … Liu, C. (2023). Generation of Whole-Body FDG Parametric KiImages From Static PET Images Using Deep Learning. IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, 7(5), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRPMS.2023.3243576

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free