Characteristics of Designated Institutional Officials and Sponsoring Institutions of ACGME-Accredited Training Programs

9Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Since the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) established the designated institutional official (DIO) role in 1998, there have been major changes in sponsoring institutions (SIs) and DIO responsibilities. Yet there remains a large gap in our knowledge regarding baseline SI and DIO characteristics as well as a need for institutions wanting to increase diversity in the DIO role and other leadership positions within the medical education community. Objective We sought to characterize demographics of DIOs and the SIs they oversee. Methods We identified SIs and DIOs on the ACGME website on February 15, 2020. Reviewed data included SI accreditation status, number of programs and resident/fellow positions, and DIO characteristics. Results We identified 831 SIs. SIs with continued accreditation sponsored more programs (median 4.0) than SIs with initial accreditation (median 1.0, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

D’souza, R. S., Langford, B., D’Souza, S., Rose, S., & Long, T. (2021). Characteristics of Designated Institutional Officials and Sponsoring Institutions of ACGME-Accredited Training Programs. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 13(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-20-00313.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free