Application Of Panel Data Models In Benchmarking Analysis Of The Electricity Distribution Sector

63Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper explores the application of several panel data models in measuring productive efficiency of the electricity distribution sector. Stochastic Frontier Analysis has been used to estimate the cost-efficiency of 59 distribution utilities operating over a nine-year period in Switzerland. The estimated coefficients and inefficiency scores are compared across three different panel data models. The results indicate that individual efficiency estimates are sensitive to the econometric specification of unobserved firm-specific heterogeneity. This paper shows that alternative panel models such as the 'true' random effects model proposed by Greene (2005) could be used to explore the possible impacts of unobserved firm-specific factors on efficiency estimates. When these factors are specified as a separate stochastic term, the efficiency estimates are substantially higher suggesting that conventional models could confound efficiency differences with other unobserved variations among companies. On the other hrefined specification of unobserved heterogeneity might lead to an underestimation of inefficiencies by mistaking potential persistent inefficiencies as external factors. Given that specification of inefficiency and heterogeneity relies on non-testable assumptions, there is no conclusive evidence in favour of one or the other specification. However, this paper argues that alternative panel data models along with conventional estimators can be used to obtain approximate lower and upper bounds for companies' efficiency scores. © 2006 The Authors. Journal compilation © CIRIEC 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farsi, M., Filippini, M., & Greene, W. (2006). Application Of Panel Data Models In Benchmarking Analysis Of The Electricity Distribution Sector. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 77(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2006.00306.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free