Comparative risk perception of the monkeypox outbreak and the monkeypox vaccine

7Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Based on survey data collected from a nationally representative sample (N = 1,000), this study applies the psychometric paradigm to demonstrate that the American public perceived the monkeypox outbreak as a more dreaded risk than the monkeypox vaccine, but they also viewed the monkeypox vaccine as a more unknown risk. These perceptions influenced their overall risk judgment toward the monkeypox outbreak, support for public health responses and government assistance measures, and likelihood to get vaccinated. Contributing to research on risk perception, these findings indicate that the dread and unknown dimensions offer a more intricate assessment of risk perception beyond perceived susceptibility and perceived severity. Guiding risk communication practice, these results suggest that it is important to highlight to the public that the monkeypox vaccine is a mature technology and getting vaccinated before exposure provides the best protection for high-risk populations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, J. Z. (2024). Comparative risk perception of the monkeypox outbreak and the monkeypox vaccine. Risk Analysis, 44(2), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14154

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free