A randomized trial comparing two laryngeal mask airway insertion techniques

33Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study was undertaken to compare laryngoscopic-guided LMA insertion with a standard insertion technique. A total of 149 patients undergoing elective general surgical and orthopaedic procedures were randomly divided into two groups. Study endpoints included ease of insertion, haemodynamic changes, local trauma bleeding, and postoperative sore throat. There were no statistically significant differences found. The laryngoscope may aid laryngeal mask airway insertion in some circumstances.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koay, C. K., Yoong, C. S., & Kok, P. (2001). A randomized trial comparing two laryngeal mask airway insertion techniques. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 29(6), 613–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x0102900609

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free