Prosthesis-patient mismatch negatively affects outcomes after mitral valve replacement: Meta-analysis of 10,239 patients

7Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: This study sought to evaluate the impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on the risk of perioperative and long-term mortality after mitral valve replacement. Methods: Databases were researched for studies published until December 2018. Main outcomes of interest were perioperative and 10-year mortality and echocardiographic parameters. Results: The research yielded 2,985 studies for inclusion. Of these, 16 articles were analyzed, and their data extracted. The total number of patients included was 10,239, who underwent mitral valve replacement. The incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch after mitral valve replacement was 53.7% (5,499 with prosthesis-patient mismatch and 4,740 without prosthesis-patient mismatch). Perioperative (OR 1.519; 95%CI 1.194–1.931, P<0.001) and 10-year (OR 1.515; 95%CI 1.280–1.795, P<0.001) mortality was increased in patients with prosthesis-patient mismatch. Patients with prosthesis-patient mismatch after mitral valve replacement had higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure and transprosthethic gradient and lower indexed effective orifice area and left ventricle ejection fraction. Conclusion: Prosthesis-patient mismatch increases perioperative and long-term mortality. Prosthesis-patient mismatch is also associated with pulmonary hypertension and depressed left ventricle systolic function. The findings of this study support the implementation of surgical strategies to prevent prosthesis-patient mismatch in order to decrease mortality rates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sá, M. P. B. O., Cavalcanti, L. R. P., Rayol, S. da C., Diniz, R. G. S., Menezes, A. M., Clavel, M. A., … Lima, R. C. (2019). Prosthesis-patient mismatch negatively affects outcomes after mitral valve replacement: Meta-analysis of 10,239 patients. Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 34(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0069

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free