Impact of heart transplant allocation change on competing waitlist outcomes among listing strategies

31Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In 2018, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) adopted a 6-tier system for heart allocation which shifted patterns in listing strategies. The effects of the change on waitlist survival and transplantation rates have yet to be substantiated by analysis of competing outcomes among various listing strategies. This study included all adult patients listed for first-time heart transplantation in UNOS between 10/17/15 and 6/12/20. Clinical characteristics were compared before and after allocation change among various listing strategies: no support, inotropes, intra-aortic balloon pump, durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD), temporary VAD, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Fine-Gray proportional subhazard models were used to estimate the effect of allocation change on competing waitlist outcomes—transplantation, death, or removal from waitlist—among each strategy. During the study period, there were 17 422 patients listed for heart transplantation. Among each listing strategy, clinical characteristics were similar before and after allocation change. Subhazard models demonstrated reduced risk for waitlist mortality (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patel, J. N., Chung, J. S., Seliem, A., Sakr, A., Stoletniy, L., Rabkin, D. G., & Abramov, D. (2021). Impact of heart transplant allocation change on competing waitlist outcomes among listing strategies. Clinical Transplantation, 35(7). https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14345

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free