Performance of a new blood pressure monitor in children and young adults: The difficulties in clinical validation

17Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a new ambulatory blood pressure monitor (Dynapulse® 5000A) in children and young adults. The reference methods, i.e. the mercury-Doppler (Hg-D) method of blood-pressure measurement (recommended for less than 5-year-old children by the British Hypertension Society criteria) and the mercury-auscultation (Hg-A) technique (recommended for 5 years and above)were initially compared utilizing 132 concomitant systolic blood pressure (SBP) readings taken among 44 subjects (3 in each) aged 2-30 years. Hg-D over-read SBP above that of the conventional Hg-A by a mean of 5.25mmHg (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.11, 6.4). This difference in measurement between the two techniques was also significantly (p = 0.01) related to age. [Difference in mmHg = 7.83 (95% CI 5.53,10.12) - 0.30 (95% CI -0.54, -0.07) age in years.] The Dynapulse® 5000A was therefore validated only against Hg-D throughout the age range and was undertaken utilizing 468 concomitant resting SBP measurements taken among 59 subjects (supine or sitting) using a 'T' system. The Dynapulse was found to give higher SBP readings (average 13.5 mmHg) than Hg-D sphygmomanometry. Although the differences were not dependent on the age of the child, the pulse rate or the body mass index, there was a significant drift in the differences with time (-0.05 mmHg/day). Repeatability of each of the measurement methods calculated utilizing two or three consecutive recordings taken at 1-min intervals showed that variability between repeated measurements made with the Dynapulse® (14.8%) was greater than for Hg-D. Repeatability coefficient of the Hg-D (11.2%) was also less than ideal for a reference method. We conclude that Dynapulse 5000A over-reads SBP above that detected by Hg-D, but cannot be fairly graded by British Hypertension Society criteria due to the inconsistency and poor repeatability of the recommended reference methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goonasekera, C. D. A., Wade, A. M., Slattery, M., Brennan, E., & Dillon, M. J. (1998). Performance of a new blood pressure monitor in children and young adults: The difficulties in clinical validation. Blood Pressure, 7(4), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/080370598437268

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free