A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of the effects of ivermectin at normal and high doses, given annually or three-monthly, against Onchocerca volvulus: Ophthalmological results

24Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A three-year randomized, controlled, double-blind trial was conducted in Cameroon to determine whether ivermectin, given at three-monthly intervals and/or at high doses (800 μg/kg), had a greater effect on adult Onchocerca volvulus than standard doses (150 μg/kg annually). As several patients complained of transitory subjective visual problems after treatment, some of them being of an unexpected type, we organized two series of detailed ophthalmological examinations to evaluate whether they were associated with ocular lesions. Analysis showed that these complaints were significantly more frequent in the two groups treated with high doses of ivermectin than in the reference group. In the ophthalmological examinations, the only differences recorded between the groups were a lower prevalence and mean number of microfilariae in the anterior chamber in the groups treated three-monthly, and, at the first examination round, a higher prevalence of early lesions of the iris in the group treated at high doses annually. These findings do not allow us to explain the cause of the transitory ocular complaints, nor why they were more frequent in the groups treated at high doses. However, one may conclude that using doses of ivermectin higher than the standard one should be considered with caution. © 2004 Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fobi, G., Gardon, J., Kamgno, J., Aimard-Favennec, L., Lafleur, C., Gardon-Wendel, N., … Boussinesq, M. (2005). A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of the effects of ivermectin at normal and high doses, given annually or three-monthly, against Onchocerca volvulus: Ophthalmological results. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 99(4), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2004.04.003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free