Resistance of humidifiers, and inspiratory work imposed by a ventilator-humidifier circuit

25Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The pressures and resistances of a bubble humidifier (Bennett Cascade) and a blow-by humidifier (Fisher and Paykel) were measured and computed at gas flow rates from 4.5 to 100 litre min-1. Pressures increased with flows, with the Bennett pressures being greater at all flows. The resistance of the Fisher-Paykel increased with flows, but remained less than that of the Bennett. An inverse resistance-flow relationship was seen with the Bennett up to a flow of 35 litre min-1. The work of breathing through a Servo 900C ventilator-humidifier circuit was computed, using a lung model. Work was performed by the Servo 900C on the lung, especially with the Fisher-Paykel circuit. The Bennett circuit required considerably greater (3.7 times more) inspiratory work. Thus the Bennett Cascade humidifier may present an unacceptable inspiratory load during spontaneous breathing. © 1991 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oh, T. E., Lin, E. S., & Bhatt, S. (1991). Resistance of humidifiers, and inspiratory work imposed by a ventilator-humidifier circuit. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 66(2), 258–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/66.2.258

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free