Mitigating Bias in Radiology Machine Learning: 1. Data Handling

112Citations
Citations of this article
134Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Minimizing bias is critical to adoption and implementation of machine learning (ML) in clinical practice. Systematic mathematical biases produce consistent and reproducible differences between the observed and expected performance of ML systems, resulting in suboptimal performance. Such biases can be traced back to various phases of ML development: data handling, model development, and performance evaluation. This report presents 12 suboptimal practices during data handling of an ML study, explains how those practices can lead to biases, and describes what may be done to mitigate them. Authors employ an arbitrary and simplified framework that splits ML data handling into four steps: data collection, data investigation, data splitting, and feature engineering. Examples from the available research literature are provided. A Google Colaboratory Jupyter notebook includes code examples to demonstrate the sub-optimal practices and steps to prevent them.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rouzrokh, P., Khosravi, B., Faghani, S., Moassefi, M., Garcia, D. V. V., Singh, Y., … Erickson, B. J. (2022). Mitigating Bias in Radiology Machine Learning: 1. Data Handling. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.210290

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free