Impact factor, H index, peer comparisons, and Retrovirology: Is it time to individualize citation metrics?

33Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is a natural tendency to judge a gift by the attractiveness of its wrapping. In some respect, this reflects current mores of measuring the gravitas of a scientific paper based on the journal cover in which the work appears. Most journals have an impact factor (IF) which some proudly display on their face page. Although historically journal IF has been a convenient quantitative shorthand, has its (mis)use contributed to inaccurate perceptions of the quality of scientific articles? Is now the time that equally convenient but more individually accurate metrics be adopted? © 2007 Jeang; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jeang, K. T. (2007, June 18). Impact factor, H index, peer comparisons, and Retrovirology: Is it time to individualize citation metrics? Retrovirology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4690-4-42

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free