Kinetic basis for selective inhibition of cyclo-oxygenases

270Citations
Citations of this article
119Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit the formation of prostaglandins by cyclo-oxygenases (COX). The discovery of a second COX isoform (COX-2) associated with inflammation led to agents that selectively inhibit COX-2, e.g. celecoxib. We evaluated the kinetics of inhibition of celecoxib and several NSAIDs. Celecoxib displays classic competitive kinetics on COX-1 (K(i) = 10-16 μM). An initial competitive interaction with COX-2 can also be discerned with celefoxib (K(i) = 11-15 μM), followed by a time-dependent interaction leading to potent inhibition, characterized as inactivation (K(inact) = 0.03-0.5 s-1). Half-maximal inhibition (IC50) using end-point assays reflects the competitive component on COX-1 (IC50 = 4-19 μM) and the inactivation component on COX-2 (IC50 0.003-0.006 μM). NSA1Ds exhibit four distinct modes of COX inhibition based on kinetic behaviour: (1) competitive, e.g. ibuprofen; (2) weak binding, time-dependent, e.g. naproxen, oxicams; (3) tight binding, time-dependent, e.g. indomethacin; (4) covalent, e.g. aspirin. In addition, most NSAIDs display different kinetic behaviour for each isoform. Weakly binding inhibitors show variable behaviour in enzyme assays, with apparent inhibitory activity being markedly influenced by experimental conditions; determination of kinetic constants with this class is unreliable and IC50 values are strongly dependent on assay conditions. Although IC50 determinations are useful for structure/activity analyses, the complex and distinct mechanisms of enzyme inhibition of each COX isoform by the NSAIDs renders comparison of inhibitory activity on COX-1 and COX-2 using IC50 ratios of questionable validity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gierse, J. K., Koboldt, C. M., Walker, M. C., Seibert, K., & Isakson, P. C. (1999). Kinetic basis for selective inhibition of cyclo-oxygenases. Biochemical Journal, 339(3), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1042/0264-6021:3390607

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free