In this comment, we summarize several scientific concerns with the recently published systematic review from O'Connor and colleagues that examined the relationship between proximity to animal-feeding operations and health of individuals in nearby communities. The authors utilized a bias tool not designed for environmental health research, erroneously excluded important studies, and incorrectly interpreted others. As a result, the conclusions drawn in the review misrepresent the evidence from the published literature, limiting its value to policymakers, researchers, and the public.
CITATION STYLE
Nachman, K. E., Lam, J., Schinasi, L. H., Smith, T. C., Feingold, B. J., & Casey, J. A. (2017, August 31). O’Connor et al. systematic review regarding animal feeding operations and public health: Critical flaws may compromise conclusions. Systematic Reviews. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0575-7
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.