Testosterone level and risk of type 2 diabetes in men: A systematic review and meta-analysis

62Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for testosterone deficiency and impaired sex steroid status. Some studies also investigated the association of testosterone level with diabetes risk in men, but reported controversial findings. To clarify this issue, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched for eligible cohort or nested case-control studies published up to August 15, 2017. Meta-analysis was used to calculate the pooled relative risk (RR) of type 2 diabetes associated with higher testosterone level. Results: Thirteen cohort or nested case-control studies with 16,709 participants were included. Meta-analysis showed that higher total testosterone level could significantly decrease the risk of type 2 diabetes in men (RR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.50-0.84; P = 0.001), and higher free testosterone level could also decrease the risk of type 2 diabetes in men (RR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.90-0.99; P = 0.014). After excluding two studies that did not calculate RRs by quartiles of testosterone levels, both higher total testosterone and free testosterone levels could decrease the risk of type 2 diabetes in men, and the pooled RRs were 0.62 (95% CI 0.51-0.76; P < 0.001) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.61-0.98; P = 0.03), respectively. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that higher testosterone level can significantly decrease the risk of type 2 diabetes in men. Therefore, combined with previous researches, the findings above suggest a reverse-causality scenario in the relation between testosterone deficiency and risk of type 2 diabetes in men.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yao, Q. M., Wang, B., An, X. F., Zhang, J. A., & Ding, L. (2018). Testosterone level and risk of type 2 diabetes in men: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine Connections, 7(1), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0253

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free