Screening for congenital hypothyroidism: The significance of threshold limit in false-negative results

134Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Context: In our neonatal program, a number of infants with congenital hypothyroidism (CH) had escaped diagnosis,whena spot RIA-TSH value of 20 mU/liter whole blood was used as a cutoff point. Objective: The objective of the study was to find out prospectively the additional number of newborns with CH if the TSH cutoff point is lowered to 10 mU/liter. Population and Methods: The study included 311,390 screened newborns. The children with CH were followed up for a period of 3 yr. Results: Twenty-eight percent of infants diagnosed with CH had neonatal TSH values between 10 and 20 mU/liter (56 of 200). Forty of 47 infants, who were reevaluated later on (85.1%), suffered permanent CH. Athyroid scintiscan and/or echogram revealed that eight of 40 children (20.0%)had a structural defect, and the remaining (32 of 40) had a functional defect of the thyroid gland without anatomical abnormality; 14 of 32 cases were familial. Eighteen of the 47 reevaluated infants were prematurely born (38.3%) and 15 of these 18 had permanent CH (83.3%). The lowering of TSH cutoff point from 20 to 10 mU/liter resulted in a 10-fold increase of recall rate. Conclusions: A significant number of cases with permanent CH are missed when a TSH threshold of 20 mU/liter is applied. Almost 40% of the missed CH cases were premature. A mild increase of TSH at screening is not a predictor of transient CH. The increase in recall rate constitutes a serious drawback and should be balanced against the possible consequences of thyroid dysfunction at this important developmental stage. Copyright © 2010 by The Endocrine Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mengreli, C., Kanaka-Gantenbein, C., Girginoudis, P., Magiakou, M. A., Christakopoulou, I., Giannoulia-Karantana, A., … Dacou-Voutetakis, C. (2010). Screening for congenital hypothyroidism: The significance of threshold limit in false-negative results. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 95(9), 4283–4290. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-0057

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free