Evidence from three cohort studies on the expression of MUC16 around the time of implantation suggests it is an inhibitor of implantation

12Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the expression of MUC16 in the endometrium peri-implantation period in three different cohort studies. Methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study. A total of 245 participants were recruited in three separate cohort studies: (1) women with recurrent miscarriage (n = 50) and fertile controls (n = 29); (2) women who had high (n = 20) or normal (n = 20) progesterone on the day of hCG trigger in ovarian stimulation cycle for IVF; and (3) women who did (n = 95) or did not (n = 31) conceive following frozen embryo transfer in HRT cycles. All subjects had archived endometrial samples precisely taken on LH+7 in natural cycles, or hCG+6 in ovarian stimulation cycles, or P+5 in HRT cycles. The H-score (median, range) of MUC16 in the luminal epithelium and glandular epithelium was determined by using immunohistochemistry. Results: The median (range) of H-score of MUC16 in the luminal epithelium (1) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss was 23.7 (0–300), which was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that of 118.4 (7.7–300) in fertile controls; (2) in women with elevated progesterone on the day of hCG administration (147.8, 18.0–230.1), significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that of women with normal progesterone (61.0, 2.3–205.3); (3) in women who conceived (23.1, 0–250.3), significantly (P < 0.001) lower than that in women who did not conceive (58.4, 0–300). Conclusion: The expression of MUC16 in all three cohort studies is consistent with it being an inhibitor of implantation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, L., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Tian, Y., Li, T. C., Zhao, L., … Zhang, S. (2020). Evidence from three cohort studies on the expression of MUC16 around the time of implantation suggests it is an inhibitor of implantation. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 37(5), 1105–1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01764-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free