Effect of three different attachment designs in the extrusive forces generated by thermoplastic aligners in the maxillary central incisor

25Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Orthodontic aligners use have increased in dentistry. The resolution of complex movements such as extrusion demands the use of attachments to reach the aimed force, but just a few studies have been developed to evaluate the biomechanical performance of the aligners and their accessories. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate on the three axes (X, Y and Z) the forces generated by three different attachment designs for the extrusion of the maxillary central incisor using esthetic orthodontic aligners. Methods: Three prototypes of maxillary models were developed, each one with a specific attachment inserted in the central incisor. Three aligners were manufactured for each of the three attachment designs, with 0.33-mm activation in the direction of the extrusion. An analytical device was used to evaluate the forces applied to the three axes by each aligner/attachment. The data were assessed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). Results: All of the studied attachment designs could sat-isfactorily perform the extrusion movement. However, force intensities were different in the three designs (design 1 = 2.5N; design 2 = 2.2 N, and design 3 = 1.1 N). Furthermore, two of the three attachment designs (designs 1 and 2) eventually exerted significant forces on the X (mesiodistal) and Y (buccopalatal) axes. Conclusion: The attachment design 3 presents the best distribution of forces for extrusion movement, generating almost null forces on X and Y axes, and lower intensity of force on the Z axis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Costa, R., Calheiros, F. C., Ballester, R. Y., & Gonçalves, F. (2020). Effect of three different attachment designs in the extrusive forces generated by thermoplastic aligners in the maxillary central incisor. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 25(3), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.25.3.046-053.oar

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free