Prognostic Factors in High Grade Osteosarcoma Patients Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Subsequently Underwent Surgery: Data from the Turkish Oncology Group

15Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Osteosarcoma is a rare but aggressive bone malignancy. Despite advances in multimodal therapy, survival remains suboptimal, highlighting the need for prognostic markers to guide treatment. Methods: This study included 162 osteosarcoma patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery between January 2009 and March 2024. Patients received either double (cisplatin + doxorubicin) or triple (MAP or PEI) chemotherapy. Survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan–Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: The median age was 20 years (IQR: 18–29), and 53.1% were male. Patients who received triple chemotherapy regimens demonstrated significantly longer overall survival (OS) compared to those on doublet regimens. High tumor necrosis rates (>90%) and negative surgical margins were strongly associated with improved OS, while metastatic disease at diagnosis, elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and male gender were linked to poorer survival. Multivariate analysis identified adjuvant therapy, age under 18, high necrosis rate, negative margins, and normal ALP as significant OS predictors. Conclusions: Triple-agent chemotherapy, necrosis rate ≥90 and negative surgical margins are strongly associated with prolonged survival in osteosarcoma. The key prognostic indicators such as ALP levels, surgical margins and age at diagnosis should guide personalized treatment strategies to improve outcomes in curable patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sever, N., Şimşek, F., Onur, İ. D., Arvas, H., Guliyev, T., Şakalar, T., … Bayoğu, İ. V. (2025). Prognostic Factors in High Grade Osteosarcoma Patients Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Subsequently Underwent Surgery: Data from the Turkish Oncology Group. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062024

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free