Military Forensic Archaeology: The Process and Recovery of U.S. Missing‐in‐Action (MIA) Service Personnel

  • Belcher W
  • Wandsnider L
  • Axelrod E
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The United States (U.S.) Department of Defense's (DoD) Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) is the largest skeletal identification laboratory in the world and receives several hundred cases per year for identification related to Missing‐in‐Action (MIA) U.S. service members. While there are various sources for these accessions, by far the largest source is through unilateral or bilateral (done in cooperation with another governmental entity or nongovernmental organization) as well as public‐private partnership excavations. While the DPAA‐style military forensic archaeology follows archaeological principles and recording standards, the work is goal‐oriented, evidence/trace‐driven, and time‐constrained—a common occurrence with cultural resource management sites or salvage/heritage archaeology throughout the world. The focus herein is to present the basic tenets and principles that guide the DPAA military forensic archaeologist in decision‐making regarding items of relevance that assist the excavation process as well as guide the individual identification process once the field operations cease. DPAA forensic archaeologists use a mindset of flexibility of standard archaeological methods and principles. This flexibility is focused on these ideals, such that a large amount of surface area must be excavated in an extremely limited time. The forensic concepts of trace relevance and trace value at various levels (a “nested” approach) of site formation, time asymmetry, and biological identification are tied to these archaeological principles and context to support the goal of forensic identification of individual missing U.S. service personnel. This article is categorized under: Crime Scene Investigation > Crime Scene Documentation and Visualization Forensic Anthropology > Anthropology in Mass Disaster & War Crime Contexts Forensic Anthropology > Forensic Archaeology

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Belcher, W. R., Wandsnider, L., Axelrod, E. N., Kennison, F., & Lawson, A. J. (2025). Military Forensic Archaeology: The Process and Recovery of U.S. Missing‐in‐Action (MIA) Service Personnel. WIREs Forensic Science, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.70017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free