Are we paraconsistent? on the luca-penrose argument and the computational theory of mind

  • Megill J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

I argue that if we are Turing machines, as the Computational Theory of Mind (CTM) holds, then we are paraconsistent, i.e. we do not implement classical logic as canonical versions of the CTM generally hold (or assume).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Megill, J. L. (2019). Are we paraconsistent? on the luca-penrose argument and the computational theory of mind. Auslegung: A Journal of Philosophy, 27(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.17161/auslegung.v27i1.12649

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free