Abstract
One of the most widespread human behavioral biases is the present bias-the tendency to overestimate current costs by a bias factor. Kleinberg and Oren (2014) introduced an elegant graph-theoretical model of inconsistent planning capturing the behavior of a present-biased agent accomplishing a set of actions. The essential measure of the system introduced by Kleinberg and Oren is the cost of irrationality-the ratio of the total cost of the actions performed by the present-biased agent to the optimal cost. This measure is vital for a task designer to estimate the aftermaths of human behavior related to time-inconsistent planning, including procrastination and abandonment. As we prove in this paper, the cost of irrationality is highly susceptible to the agent's choices when faced with a few possible actions of equal estimated costs. To address this issue, we propose a modification of Kleinberg-Oren's model of inconsistent planning. In our model, when an agent selects from several options of minimum prescribed cost, he uses a randomized procedure. We explore the algorithmic complexity of computing and estimating the cost of irrationality in the new model.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Dementiev, Y., Fomin, F., & Ignatiev, A. (2022). Inconsistent Planning: When in Doubt, Toss a Coin! In Proceedings of the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2022 (Vol. 36, pp. 9724–9731). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i9.21207
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.