Intravenous line diameter: Is bigger really better?

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the size of an intravenous catheter influences the cannulation success rate and procedure duration among military medics. Methods: According to a prospective, randomized, controlled crossover study design, 114 military medic cadets were paired and inserted 14-gauge (14G) and 16G intravenous catheters into veins in the antecubital fossa. Success rate and procedure duration were determined. Results: The overall success rate for 14G and 16G catheters was 80 and 86%, respectively. Average procedure duration was 33 ± 14.7 and 35.2 ± 14.9 seconds, respectively. No significant differences were found in either success rate or procedure duration between the examined catheter sizes. Conclusion: Successful intravenous cannulation was unaffected by catheter size. Therefore, 14G intravenous catheters are recommended for use by military medics on the battlefield.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leibovici, D., Gofrit, O. N., Fredman, B., Shemer, J., Noga, Y., Heruti, R. J., & Stein, M. (1997). Intravenous line diameter: Is bigger really better? Military Medicine, 162(3), 183–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/162.3.183

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free