Improving the Practice of Geology through Explicit Inclusion of Scientific Uncertainty for Data and Models

10Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The field of geology is poised to make a fundamental transition in the quality, character, and types of science that are possible for practitioners. Geologists are developing data systems consistent with their workflow to digitally collect, store, and share data. Separately, geologists and cognitive scientists have been working together to develop tools that can characterize the level of uncertainty of both data and models. The transformational change comes from the simultaneous combination of these two approaches: digital data systems designed to capture and convey scientific uncertainty. This approach promotes better data collection practice, improves reproducibility, and increases trust in community-based digital data. We applied these methods attending to uncertainty and its incorporation into digital repositories to the Sage Hen Flat pluton in eastern California, USA, where two published maps provide different interpretations. Incorporating uncertainty into our workflow, from field data collection to publication, allows us to move beyond binary choices (e.g., is this data/ model right or wrong?) to a more nuanced view (e.g., what is my level of uncertainty about the data/model?) that is shareable with the larger community.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tikoff, B., Shipley, T. F., Nelson, E. M., Williams, R. T., Barshi, N., & Wilson, C. (2023). Improving the Practice of Geology through Explicit Inclusion of Scientific Uncertainty for Data and Models. GSA Today, 33(7), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG560A.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free