Urea and guanidinium chloride denature protein L in different ways in molecular dynamics simulations

149Citations
Citations of this article
253Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In performing protein-denaturation experiments, it is common to employ different kinds of denaturants interchangeably. Wemake use of molecular dynamics simulations of Protein L in water, in urea, and in guanidinium chloride (GdmCl) to ascertain if there are any structural differences in the associated unfolding processes. The simulation of proteins in solutions of GdmCl is complicated by the large number of charges involved, making it difficult to set up a realistic force field. Furthermore, at high concentrations of this denaturant, the motion of the solvent slows considerably. The simulations show that the unfolding mechanism depends on the denaturing agent: in urea the β-sheet is destabilized first, whereas in GdmCl, it is the α-helix. Moreover, whereas urea interacts with the protein accumulating in the first solvation shell, GdmCl displays a longer-range electrostatic effect that does not perturb the structure of the solvent close to the protein. © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Camilloni, C., Guerini Rocco, A., Eberini, I., Gianazza, E., Broglia, R. A., & Tiana, G. (2008). Urea and guanidinium chloride denature protein L in different ways in molecular dynamics simulations. Biophysical Journal, 94(12), 4654–4661. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.125799

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free