Neurostimulation for cognitive rehabilitation in stroke (NeuroCog): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

4Citations
Citations of this article
214Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Stroke patients may present severe cognitive impairments, primarily related to executive functions. Transcranial direct current stimulation has shown promising results, with neuromodulatory and neuroplastic effects. This study is a double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial aiming to compare the long-term effects of stimulation in two different cognitive regions after a stroke. Methods/Design: Sixty patients who suffer from chronic strokes will be randomized into one of four groups: dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, cingulo-opercular network, motor primary cortex and sham stimulation. Each group will receive transcranial direct current stimulation at an intensity of 2mA for 20minutes daily for 10 consecutive days. Patients will be assessed with a Dysexecutive Questionnaire, Semantic Fluency Test, categorical verbal fluency and Go-no go tests, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test, Letter Comparison and Pattern Comparison Tasks at baseline and after their tenth stimulation session. Those who achieve clinical improvement with neurostimulation will be invited to receive treatment for 12months as part of a follow-up study. Discussion: Long-term stimulation could be analyzed in regard to possible adaptive changes on plasticity after structural brain damage and if these changes are different in terms of clinical improvement when applied to two important cognitive centers. Trials registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02315807. 9 December 2014.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andrade, S. M., Fernández-Calvo, B., Boggio, P. S., de Oliveira, E. A., Gomes, L. F., Pinheiro Júnior, J. E. G., … Alves, N. T. (2015). Neurostimulation for cognitive rehabilitation in stroke (NeuroCog): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0945-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free