The State of Uberisation: Neoliberalism, Smart Urbanism, and the Regulated Deregulation of Toronto's Taxi-cum-Ridehail Market

5Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In 2016, the City of Toronto legalised the ridehail giant Uber under a particularly Uber-friendly regulatory regime. Rather than understanding this interim outcome along the lines of now widespread narratives of corporate “disruption”, in this article I take up Manuel B. Aalbers’ notion of “regulated deregulation” in order to foreground the state's role as a manically prolific facilitator of early Uberisation. Based on ethnographic research in Toronto, I argue that the three longer-standing state spatial strategies of (1) the common-sense neoliberal state, (2) the labour-averse competition state, and (3) the tech-infatuated smart state were paramount in creating those “on-the-ground” conditions—social, legal, spatial, and other—on which Uber has been able to thrive in many cities across the North American continent.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Namberger, F. (2024). The State of Uberisation: Neoliberalism, Smart Urbanism, and the Regulated Deregulation of Toronto’s Taxi-cum-Ridehail Market. Antipode, 56(1), 206–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12972

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free