The mimetic dimension: Literature between neuroscience and phenomenology

8Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

When we are most immersed in literary reading, and when that immersion is most significant, we may experience a literary work as constitutive of a 'world'. With reference to the phenomenological tradition, it can be shown how this world is both a novel creation and serves to disclose, not least by shifting our perspective from, the world of ordinary experience. In this light, it will be shown how the problem of mimesis poses a challenge for recent neuroscientific approaches to literature. At the same time, neuroscientific findings show the insufficiency of phenomenological accounts which fail to acknowledge the physiological and cognitive processes that underlie literary imagining. I introduce the notion of the 'mimetic dimension' in order to clarify what accounts based on phenomenology and neuroscience can and cannot explain about literary mimesis and the experience of a literary world.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gosetti-Ferencei, J. A. (2014). The mimetic dimension: Literature between neuroscience and phenomenology. British Journal of Aesthetics, 54(4), 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayu003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free