Effects of incorporation of poly(γ-glutamic acid) in chitosan/DNA complex nanoparticles on cellular uptake and transfection efficiency

124Citations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Chitosan (CS)/DNA complex nanoparticles (NPs) have been considered as a vector for gene delivery. Although advantageous for DNA packing and protection, CS-based complexes may lead to difficulties in DNA release once arriving at the site of action. In this study, an approach through modifying their internal structure by incorporating a negatively charged poly(γ-glutamic acid) (γ-PGA) in CS/DNA complexes (CS/DNA/γ-PGA NPs) is reported. The analysis of small angle X-ray scattering results revealed that DNA and γ-PGA formed complexes with CS separately to yield two types of domains, leading to the formation of "compounded NPs". With this internal structure, the compounded NPs might disintegrate into a number of even smaller sub-particles after cellular internalization, thus improving the dissociation capacity of CS and DNA. Consequently, after incorporating γ-PGA in CS/DNA complexes, a significant increase in their transfection efficiency was found. Interestingly, in addition to improving the release of DNA intracellularly, the incorporation of γ-PGA in CS/DNA complexes significantly enhanced their cellular uptake. We further demonstrated that besides a non-specific charged-mediated binding to cell membranes, there were specific trypsin-cleavable proteins involved in the internalization of CS/DNA/γ-PGA NPs. The aforementioned results indicated that γ-PGA played multiple important roles in enhancing the cellular uptake and transfection efficiency of CS/DNA/γ-PGA NPs. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peng, S. F., Yang, M. J., Su, C. J., Chen, H. L., Lee, P. W., Wei, M. C., & Sung, H. W. (2009). Effects of incorporation of poly(γ-glutamic acid) in chitosan/DNA complex nanoparticles on cellular uptake and transfection efficiency. Biomaterials, 30(9), 1797–1808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free