The dose–effect relationship in PTSD: the South African Constitutional Court Case of AK v. Minister of Police (2022)

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The decision of the South African Constitutional Court in AK v. Minister of Police has implications for law enforcement agencies that fail the victims of crime. In this matter, the plaintiff sued the Minister and others for damages after officers had failed to rescue her from the perpetrator(s) of a protracted sexual assault and to conduct an adequate criminal investigation afterwards. The judgment deals with a noteworthy psycholegal issue, namely, whether the police are liable for any harm resulting from the plaintiff’s continued trauma exposure beyond the moment a competent search would have likely resulted in her rescue, when her trauma exposure was already prolonged. In this paper, we consider whether the interpretation of the expert evidence is consistent with the relevant research. Research suggests the psychological harm caused by police negligence may have been more than a matter of extended trauma exposure but also of supplemental trauma appraisals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Young, C., Nagdee, M., & Pieterse, A. (2025). The dose–effect relationship in PTSD: the South African Constitutional Court Case of AK v. Minister of Police (2022). Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 32(4), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2024.2330047

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free